Skip to content
Carmelics
Topics
Thinkers
Changes
Contributors
Loading account…
Home
/
Original
/
inverse
See Original
Inverse View
It is not the case that If we care about privacy, then we should give all control of access to personal information to the individual.
?
Set your confidence on the premises below to see your aggregate.
Reasons For
2 perspectives
Reason for 1 of 2
?
1.
Privacy exists alongside competing social values—transparency, accountability, and public safety—that can legitimately override individual control.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
Absolute individual control over personal information would shield wrongdoers from justified scrutiny, undermining the rule of law.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
3.
Warren and Brandeis's foundational privacy framework already acknowledged that privacy rights yield to matters of public concern.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Reason for 2 of 2
?
1.
Nissenbaum's contextual integrity theory holds that privacy is violated not by access per se, but by information flowing outside appropriate social contexts.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
If contextual norms rather than individual will determine appropriate information flow, then individual control is neither necessary nor sufficient for privacy protection.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Reasons Against
1 perspective
Reason against
?
1.
Control of access to one's personal information is the key to maintaining privacy.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
Privacy is a value worth protecting.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Next step
Based on where you are in your exploration
Strongest counterpoint
Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.
Statements
321,452
Perspectives
108,905
Topics
42