Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Home/Original/inverse
    See Original
    Inverse View

    It is not the case that If weakness of will involves acting contrary to one's best rational assessment, it constitutes a distinct third category irreducible to either rational conformity or mechanical causation.

    ?Set your confidence on the premises below to see your aggregate.

    Reasons For

    1 perspective
    Reason for
    ?
    • 1.What appears as acting against 'best judgment' may reflect competing rational judgments (immediate vs. long-term) resolvable within standard rational choice theory.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.Invoking a third category merely relabels the problem rather than explaining it; the mechanism generating the conflict remains causally determined or rationally explicable.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.The subjective experience of conflict doesn't prove irreducibility; deterministic neural processes regularly produce experiences of deliberation and resistance.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Reasons Against

    1 perspective
    Reason against
    ?
    • 1.Akratic agents report subjective experience of internal conflict absent in purely causal or rational scenarios, suggesting distinct phenomenology.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.Both pure rationalism (ignoring motivation) and determinism (denying deliberation) fail to explain why agents *endorse* their rational judgment yet disobey it.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.Weakness of will requires the agent to simultaneously hold and reject a judgment, a logical structure neither mechanism nor rationality alone accommodates.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Strongest counterpoint
    Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42