Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    If weakness of will involves acting contrary to one's bes... — Carmelics
    Home
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Challenges→There is a middle-ground between perfect conformity to reason and being caused to act by natural forces.

    If weakness of will involves acting contrary to one's best rational assessment, it constitutes a distinct third category irreducible to either rational conformity or mechanical causation.

    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.
    1 reason for
    1 reason against

    Reasons For

    1 perspective
    Reason for
    ?
    • 1.Akratic agents report subjective experience of internal conflict absent in purely causal or rational scenarios, suggesting distinct phenomenology.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.Both pure rationalism (ignoring motivation) and determinism (denying deliberation) fail to explain why agents *endorse* their rational judgment yet disobey it.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.Weakness of will requires the agent to simultaneously hold and reject a judgment, a logical structure neither mechanism nor rationality alone accommodates.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Reasons Against

    1 perspective
    Reason against
    ?
    • 1.What appears as acting against 'best judgment' may reflect competing rational judgments (immediate vs. long-term) resolvable within standard rational choice theory.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.Invoking a third category merely relabels the problem rather than explaining it; the mechanism generating the conflict remains causally determined or rationally explicable.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.The subjective experience of conflict doesn't prove irreducibility; deterministic neural processes regularly produce experiences of deliberation and resistance.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Strongest counterpoint
    Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.

    Key Terms

    Acting contrary to one's best rational assessment(in ethics and decision-making)
    Going against what you've logically concluded is the best thing to do; basically, acting against your own better judgment.
    Distinct third category(in philosophical classification)
    A separate kind of thing that is fundamentally different from the two other kinds being discussed, not just a mixture of them.
    Rational conformity(in philosophy of action)
    Behavior that matches up with logical thinking and conscious reasoning—doing what makes sense based on your beliefs and goals.
    irreducible(Personalist anthropology; distinguishes personhood from mere biological individuality)
    That which is unique and unrepeatable in each human being, by virtue of which a person is not merely an individual of a species but a personal subject.
    mechanical causation(The traditional model Newtonians were accused of abandoning)
    Causal interaction restricted to contact between bodies
    weakness of will(Aristotelian virtue ethics as applied by Crummell)
    A condition in which an agent requires effortful reason to act morally, indicating that the habits of virtue are not yet fully formed

    Connections

    2 topics

    Free Will & Foreknowledge1 linkedMoral Responsibility1 linked

    Related

    Akratic agents report subjective experience of internal conflict absent in purel...Both pure rationalism (ignoring motivation) and determinism (denying deliberatio...

    Details

    Type
    claim
    Perspectives
    2 (1 for, 1 against)
    Edits
    1 edit
    Invoking a third category merely relabels the problem rather than explaining it;...
    The subjective experience of conflict doesn't prove irreducibility; deterministi...
    +3 moreShow less
    There is a middle-ground between perfect conformity to reason and being caused t...Weakness of will requires the agent to simultaneously hold and reject a judgment...What appears as acting against 'best judgment' may reflect competing rational ju...