Skip to content
Carmelics
Topics
Thinkers
Changes
Contributors
Loading account…
Statements
321,452
Perspectives
108,905
Topics
42
Home
/
Original
/
inverse
See Original
Inverse View
It is not the case that Immediate judgments cannot be false and must therefore be certain
?
Set your confidence on the premises below to see your aggregate.
Reasons For
2 perspectives
Reason for 1 of 2
?
1.
Descartes' cogito aside, even introspective judgments about one's own mental states are subject to systematic misreporting, as Nisbett & Wilson's 1977 empirical work demonstrated.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
If a judgment class admits of any false instances, certainty cannot be guaranteed by membership in that class alone, regardless of how the class is defined.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Reason for 2 of 2
?
1.
Wilfrid Sellars argued in 'Empiricism and the Philosophy of Mind' that all epistemic justification is inferential, making the category of genuinely non-inferential 'immediate' judgment incoherent.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
A judgment that cannot in principle be false is not a cognitive achievement but a tautology, and tautologies carry no genuine epistemic content about the world.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Reasons Against
1 perspective
Reason against
?
1.
Immediate judgments exist
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
Immediate judgments, by their nature, cannot be false
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Next step
Based on where you are in your exploration
Strongest counterpoint
Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.