Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Inclusivists claim salvation depends on conditions or eve... — Carmelics
    Home/Religious Experience
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Challenges→Inclusivists are wrong to argue that salvation is possible only because of conditions or events described in the one true religion

    Inclusivists claim salvation depends on conditions or events specific to the one true religion

    Religious Experience
    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

    No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Topics

    Religious Experience

    Related

    Inclusivists are wrong to argue that salvation is possible only because of condi...There is no one true religion

    Similar

    Inclusivists are wrong to argue that salvation is possible only becaus...

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Browse more in Religious Experience
    Related propositions within the same area of thought.
    87%
    Salvation is not possible only because of conditions or events describ...80%
    The criteria for salvation specified by that perspective are epistemol...78%
    Some adherents of other religions can be saved through the salvific pr...78%

    Source

    AI-extracted
    SEP: religious-pluralism
    View source passageHide passage
    Salvific pluralists, however, find such reasoning no more convincing than that offered by exclusivists. Inclusivists are right, pluralists grant, to say that individuals need not necessarily know of or fulfill certain requirements normally specified in a given religion to attain salvation. But inclusivists, like exclusivists, are wrong to argue that this salvation is, itself, possible only because of certain conditions or events described in the one true religion. There is no one true religion a

    Details

    Type
    premise
    Perspectives
    0 (0 for, 0 against)
    Edits
    1 edit

    Open for perspectives

    This idea is waiting for its first supporting or challenging perspective.

    Share the first perspective