Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Incommensurability between values like friendship and jus... — Carmelics
    Home
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Challenges→Monist theories can be pluralist at the level of ordinary choice by positing intermediate values that derive their worth from a single foundational value

    Incommensurability between values like friendship and justice cannot be dissolved by reducing both to a common currency without distorting practical reasoning, as Ruth Chang has argued.

    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

    No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Key Terms

    Common currency(as used in philosophy of value)
    A single measurement or standard that can be used to compare different things—like using money to compare the value of apples and oranges.
    Incommensurability(Decision theory / rational choice theory)
    A relation between two options A and B such that neither A is at least as good as B nor B is at least as good as A, under the standard interpretation of the weak preference relation
    Reducing (philosophical reduction)(as used in metaphysics and philosophy of value)
    Breaking something complex down into simpler parts, or explaining one thing in terms of another simpler thing.
    Ruth Chang(as the philosopher proposing the concept discussed)
    A contemporary philosopher who studies how we make decisions and comparisons between things, particularly when it's unclear which option is better.

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Explore a random proposition
    Start fresh with something unrelated.
    Values
    Values are the principles and beliefs that are most important to you—the things you care deeply about and use to guide your decisions and actions. They're like your personal compass, helping you determine what's right, what matters, and how you want to live your life. For example, someone might value honesty, family, creativity, or helping others, and these values shape the choices they make every day.
    practical reasoning(Central to the full attribution of intentional agency)
    The capacity to treat the contents of mental attitudes as premises in reasoning that leads to action

    Connections

    1 topic

    Consequentialism1 linked

    Related

    Monist theories can be pluralist at the level of ordinary choice by positing int...

    Details

    Type
    claim
    Perspectives
    0 (0 for, 0 against)
    Edits
    1 edit

    Open for perspectives

    This idea is waiting for its first supporting or challenging perspective.

    Share the first perspective