Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    It is a priori implausible to hold that humans are predis... — Carmelics
    Home/Skepticism
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Challenges→It is not reasonable to suppose that the best explanation we have considered is also the absolutely best explanation overall.

    It is a priori implausible to hold that humans are predisposed to hit upon the absolutely best explanation when considering possible explanations.

    SkepticismTruth & Knowledge
    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

    No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Topics

    SkepticismTruth & Knowledge

    Related

    Assuming our considered explanations include the absolutely best explanation req...It is not reasonable to suppose that the best explanation we have considered is ...We rarely consider all potential explanations of the data.

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Browse more in Skepticism
    Related propositions within the same area of thought.

    Similar

    It is not reasonable to suppose that the best explanation we have cons...81%There is always empirical uncertainty in attributing understanding eve...80%The least improbable explanation is the most probable explanation80%Appearances can provide non-trivial explanations for what one believes...79%

    Source

    AI-extracted
    SEP: abduction
    View source passageHide passage
    How reasonable is it to suppose that this extra requirement is usually fulfilled? Not at all, presumably. To believe otherwise, we must assume some sort of privilege on our part to the effect that when we consider possible explanations of the data, we are somehow predisposed to hit, inter alia, upon the absolutely best explanation of those data. After all, hardly ever will we have considered, or will it even be possible to consider, all potential explanations. As van Fraassen (1989, 144) points

    Details

    Type
    premise
    Perspectives
    0 (0 for, 0 against)
    Edits
    1 edit

    Open for perspectives

    This idea is waiting for its first supporting or challenging perspective.

    Share the first perspective