Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Home/Original/inverse
    See Original
    Inverse View

    It is not the case that It is not that it serves any of those

    ?Set your confidence on the premises below to see your aggregate.

    Reasons For

    1 perspective
    Reason for
    ?
    • 1.The damned gain nothing through everlasting torment
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.If the above is true, it is not that it serves the damned
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Reasons Against

    2 perspectives
    Reason against 1 of 2
    ?
    • 1.Retributive justice, as developed by Kant, requires punishment proportional to moral transgression regardless of benefit to the punished.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.If eternal conscious torment serves neither the damned nor observers, it fails Kant's categorical demand that punishment honor rational agency by being deserved.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.A punishment that serves no rational agent—neither victim, society, nor offender—cannot be justified under any coherent retributive framework.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Reason against 2 of 2
    ?
    • 1.Jonathan Kvanvig argues in 'The Problem of Hell' that divine justice requires purposes beyond mere retribution to avoid being indistinguishable from cosmic cruelty.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.If eternal torment serves none of the traditional purposes—deterrence, reformation, satisfaction, or the common good—it constitutes purposeless suffering.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.Purposeless suffering inflicted by an omnipotent agent is morally indistinguishable from malice, which contradicts essential divine omnibenevolence.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Strongest counterpoint
    Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.