Jonathan Edwards' 'Sinners in the Hands of an Angry God' theology implies the offense, not the sinner's particular acts, determines punishment, collapsing individual differentiation.

?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.

'Sinners in the Hands of an Angry God'(the specific work being discussed): A famous sermon Edwards wrote that describes humans as powerless and deserving of punishment from an angry God, meant to scare people into religious devotion.
Collapsing(as used in logical argumentation): In philosophy, this means showing that two things we thought were different are actually the same or equally valid.
Individual differentiation(what the theology supposedly ignores or eliminates): The idea that each person is unique and should be treated differently based on their own specific circumstances or choices.
Jonathan Edwards(as the source of this philosophical argument): An American theologian and philosopher from the 1700s who wrote extensively about God's justice, sin, and damnation from a Christian perspective.

Based on where you are in your exploration