Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Judgments about external objects are always open to doubt... — Carmelics
    Home/Skepticism
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Supports→Phenomenology as a rigorous science must limit its study to objects of immanent perception rather than transcendent external objects.

    Judgments about external objects are always open to doubt because those objects go beyond what experience can fully deliver.

    SkepticismTruth & Knowledge
    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

    No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Topics

    SkepticismTruth & Knowledge

    Connections

    2 topics

    Perception3 linkedConsciousness & Mind

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Browse more in Skepticism
    Related propositions within the same area of thought.
    1 linked

    Related

    A rigorous science grounded only in what does not go beyond experience cannot ta...External objects inherently transcend any finite set of experiences; no external...Phenomenology as a rigorous science must limit its study to objects of immanent ...Three-dimensional external objects are never exhaustively presented in perceptio...

    Similar

    Skepticism about external objects does not undermine the certainty of ...83%Sanches doubts the possibility of perfect knowledge of external things...83%External objects inherently transcend any finite set of experiences; n...82%Talk about minds and external objects beyond perceptions is explicable...81%

    Source

    AI-extracted
    SEP: ingarden
    View source passageHide passage
    Ingarden takes Husserl to have been driven to transcendental idealism largely by his epistemological goals and transcendental approach to phenomenology. If the very idea of three-dimensional external objects makes sense, it would be essential that our perceptions of them are inevitably inadequate: They may be presented from one point of view or another, but never exhaustively and entirely -- so room is always left open for new perceptions that would lead us to entirely revise our past judgments.

    Details

    Type
    premise
    Perspectives
    0 (0 for, 0 against)
    Edits
    1 edit

    Open for perspectives

    This idea is waiting for its first supporting or challenging perspective.

    Share the first perspective