Kant's distinction between acting from duty and merely in accordance with duty shows that genuine rational agency requires the reason itself—not a desire it produces—to be the motivating ground.

?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.

Acting from duty(as a type of motivation for action): Doing something because you believe it's the right thing to do morally, rather than because you want the outcome or enjoy it.
In accordance with duty(in ethics and moral motivation): Doing the right action, but for the wrong reason—like helping someone because it makes you feel good or because you expect a reward, even though the action itself happens to be moral.
Kant(as used in epistemology and metaphysics): Immanuel Kant (1724-1804) was an influential German philosopher who argued that our minds shape how we experience reality, and that we can only truly know things as they appear to us, not as they are in themselves.
Motivating ground(in discussions of motivation and causation): The actual reason or cause that makes you do something—what really drives your action.

Based on where you are in your exploration