Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Katastematic pleasure refers to a state or condition, not... — Carmelics
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Home/Philosophy of Language
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Supports→Freedom from pain and from distress is a kind of pleasure, specifically the most complete pleasure.

    Katastematic pleasure refers to a state or condition, not a motion.

    Philosophy of LanguageVirtue Ethics
    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

    No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Topics

    Philosophy of LanguageVirtue Ethics

    Connections

    3 topics

    Truth & Knowledge1 linked

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Browse more in Philosophy of Language
    Related propositions within the same area of thought.
    Consequentialism
    1 linked
    Personal Identity1 linked

    Related

    Epicurus holds that this state qualifies as pleasure (Principal Doctrines III).Freedom from pain and from distress is a kind of pleasure, specifically the most...Freedom from pain and from distress is a state or condition.

    Similar

    Katastematic pleasure can be understood as the enjoyment of one's natu...87%Epicurus holds that this state qualifies as pleasure (Principal Doctri...86%Therefore, pleasure indicates the presence of something desirable, whi...84%Conceptual analysis of 'pleasure' may not confirm that pleasure is one...83%

    Source

    AI-extracted
    SEP: ethics-ancient
    View source passageHide passage
    The usual way to understand the pleasure of freedom from pain and from distress is by way of the distinction between kinetic pleasures and katastematic, or what are, following Cicero, misleadingly called ‘static’ ones (Diogenes Laertius X 136). The name of the former implies motion and the name of the latter implies a state or condition. The reason the distinction is important is that freedom from pain and from distress is a state or condition, not a motion. Epicurus holds not only that this sta

    Details

    Type
    premise
    Perspectives
    0 (0 for, 0 against)
    Edits
    1 edit

    Open for perspectives

    This idea is waiting for its first supporting or challenging perspective.

    Share the first perspective