Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Kripke's original necessity-of-identity arguments apply t... — Carmelics
    Home
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Challenges→If the laws of nature are necessary, the melting point of gold is necessary in the same way that gold's atomic number is necessary.

    Kripke's original necessity-of-identity arguments apply to constitutive essences, not to relational, law-dependent dispositional properties.

    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.
    1 reason for
    1 reason against

    Reasons For

    1 perspective
    Reason for
    ?
    • 1.Kripke's arguments focus on rigid designation and metaphysical necessity grounded in intrinsic identity conditions, not external relational facts.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.Dispositional properties depend on counterfactual conditionals and background laws, making them epistemically and metaphysically contingent.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.Constitutive essences (like atomic number for gold) survive across possible worlds; dispositional properties vary with different physical laws.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Reasons Against

    1 perspective
    Reason against
    ?
    • 1.Kripke explicitly argues necessity applies to origin and fundamental properties, which include relational causal-historical facts about objects.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.The distinction between constitutive and dispositional is unclear: physical properties often ground both intrinsic identity and dispositions jointly.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.Even if Kripke's arguments target intrinsics, this doesn't show relational properties aren't necessary—they may be necessarily grounded in essences.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Strongest counterpoint
    Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.

    Connections

    2 topics

    Modality & Possibility1 linkedPhilosophy of Language1 linked

    Related

    Constitutive essences (like atomic number for gold) survive across possible worl...Dispositional properties depend on counterfactual conditionals and background la...Even if Kripke's arguments target intrinsics, this doesn't show relational prope...If the laws of nature are necessary, the melting point of gold is necessary in t...
    +3 moreShow less
    Kripke explicitly argues necessity applies to origin and fundamental properties,...Kripke's arguments focus on rigid designation and metaphysical necessity grounde...The distinction between constitutive and dispositional is unclear: physical prop...

    Details

    Type
    claim
    Perspectives
    2 (1 for, 1 against)
    Edits
    1 edit