Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Later work by Buchholz (1997) and others revealed that th... — Carmelics
    Home/Proof of definition segments
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Supports→There is an intrinsic connection between Gentzen's ordinal assignment to deductions in PA and the standard ordinal assignment to infinite deductions in PA_ω

    Later work by Buchholz (1997) and others revealed that these two assignment methods are intrinsically connected

    All sources support itProof of definition segments
    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

    No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Topics

    Proof of definition segmentsAll sources support it

    Connections

    1 topic

    Truth & Knowledge2 linked

    Related

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Browse more in Proof of definition segments
    Related propositions within the same area of thought.
    Gentzen's method assigned ordinals to purported proofs of the empty sequentThe infinitary approach assigns ordinals to infinite deductions in PA_ωThere is an intrinsic connection between Gentzen's ordinal assignment to deducti...

    Similar

    Lindenbaum and Mostowski (1938) established this result using the Frae...71%There is an intrinsic connection between Gentzen's ordinal assignment ...70%Aharonov and Bohm independently arrived at the same conclusion as Weyl...70%Bott and Milnor (1958) independently proved the same result.67%

    Source

    AI-extracted
    SEP: proof-theory
    View source passageHide passage
    Gentzen did not deal explicitly with infinite proof trees in his second published proof of the consistency of PA (Gentzen 1938b). However, in the unpublished first consistency proof of Gentzen 1974 he aims at showing that a proof of a sequent in first-order arithmetic gives rise to a a well-founded reduction tree; that tree can be identified with a cut-free proof in the sequent calculus with the \(\omega\)-rule. The infinitary version of PA with the \(\omega\)-rule was investigated by Schütte (1

    Details

    Type
    premise
    Perspectives
    0 (0 for, 0 against)
    Edits
    1 edit

    Open for perspectives

    This idea is waiting for its first supporting or challenging perspective.

    Share the first perspective