Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Lindenbaum and Mostowski (1938) established this result u... — Carmelics
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Home/Truth & Knowledge
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Supports→Zermelo's axioms for set theory are insufficient to prove the Axiom of Choice, or even that every infinite set is the disjoint union of two infinite sets.

    Lindenbaum and Mostowski (1938) established this result using the Fraenkel-Mostowski method.

    All sources support itTruth & Knowledge
    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

    No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Topics

    Truth & KnowledgeAll sources support it

    Connections

    1 topic

    Modality & Possibility2 linked

    Related

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Browse more in Truth & Knowledge
    Related propositions within the same area of thought.
    The Fraenkel-Mostowski construction produces a Henkin (set-theoretic) model in w...Zermelo's axioms for set theory are insufficient to prove the Axiom of Choice, o...

    Similar

    Bott and Milnor (1958) independently proved the same result.83%Perrin's estimate of Avogadro's number agreed with determinations made...74%Aharonov and Bohm independently arrived at the same conclusion as Weyl...73%Aumann (1995) and Stalnaker (1998) reach contradictory results72%

    Source

    AI-extracted
    SEP: logic-higher-order
    View source passageHide passage
    For more on the proof theory of second-order logic, see Buss (1998). There is a translation of many sorted logic further to single sorted first order logic due essentially to Herbrand (1930), see also Wang (1952) and Schmidt (1951). This can be used to obtain many of the basic properties of first order logic first for many sorted logic and then further for second-order logic with general models. The most important application of general models is the Completeness Theorem: Theorem 14 (Henkin 1

    Details

    Type
    premise
    Perspectives
    0 (0 for, 0 against)
    Edits
    1 edit

    Open for perspectives

    This idea is waiting for its first supporting or challenging perspective.

    Share the first perspective