Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Home/Original/inverse
    See Original
    Inverse View

    It is not the case that Laudan's pessimistic meta-induction shows that historically successful convergent detections have repeatedly pointed to entities later abandoned (caloric, phlogiston, the ether).

    ?Set your confidence on the premises below to see your aggregate.

    Reasons For

    1 perspective
    Reason for
    ?
    • 1.Caloric and phlogiston were abandoned because they failed explanatory tasks; success was narrower than claimed.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.Surviving theoretical structure (thermodynamics equations, oxidation reactions) persisted; only false entities were eliminated.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.We now have stronger criteria (unification, mechanism-independence, empirical precision) than past theories possessed.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Reasons Against

    1 perspective
    Reason against
    ?
    • 1.Caloric, phlogiston, and ether were genuinely predictively successful before abandonment, matching Laudan's criterion.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.No principled method existed to distinguish these false successes from true ones, undermining justified confidence in current theory.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.Modern successful theories (dark matter, quantum fields) remain ontologically controversial, suggesting history repeats.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Strongest counterpoint
    Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.