Skip to content

Topics Thinkers Changes ContributorsLoading account…

Carmelics

A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

Navigate

Topics
Search
Recent Changes
Contribute
How It Works
Glossary
Thinkers
Contributors
About
Statistics
Terms
Privacy

Database

Statements: —
Perspectives: —
Topics: —

Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

Made within

DC&

Austin

Statements: 321,452
Perspectives: 108,905
Topics: 42

Laudan's pessimistic meta-induction shows that historical... — Carmelics

History Edit See Inverse

Part of a larger discussion

Challenges→Realism regarding the putative target of detection is well-supported when distinct modes of detection reveal the same thing.

Laudan's pessimistic meta-induction shows that historically successful convergent detections have repeatedly pointed to entities later abandoned (caloric, phlogiston, the ether).

?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

1 reason for

1 reason against

Reasons For

1 perspective

Reason for

?

1.Caloric, phlogiston, and ether were genuinely predictively successful before abandonment, matching Laudan's criterion.
?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.No principled method existed to distinguish these false successes from true ones, undermining justified confidence in current theory.
?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
3.Modern successful theories (dark matter, quantum fields) remain ontologically controversial, suggesting history repeats.
?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

Reasons Against

1 perspective

Reason against

?

1.Caloric and phlogiston were abandoned because they failed explanatory tasks; success was narrower than claimed.
?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.Surviving theoretical structure (thermodynamics equations, oxidation reactions) persisted; only false entities were eliminated.
?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
3.We now have stronger criteria (unification, mechanism-independence, empirical precision) than past theories possessed.
?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

Next step

Based on where you are in your exploration

Strongest counterpoint

Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.

Connections

2 topics

Truth & Knowledge1 linked Skepticism1 linked

Related

Caloric and phlogiston were abandoned because they failed explanatory tasks; suc...Caloric, phlogiston, and ether were genuinely predictively successful before aba...Modern successful theories (dark matter, quantum fields) remain ontologically co...No principled method existed to distinguish these false successes from true ones...

+3 moreShow less

Realism regarding the putative target of detection is well-supported when distin...Surviving theoretical structure (thermodynamics equations, oxidation reactions) ...We now have stronger criteria (unification, mechanism-independence, empirical pr...

Details

Type: claim
Perspectives: 2 (1 for, 1 against)
Edits: 1 edit