Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    The Fraenkel-Mostowski construction produces a Henkin (se... — Carmelics
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Home/Modality & Possibility
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Supports→Zermelo's axioms for set theory are insufficient to prove the Axiom of Choice, or even that every infinite set is the disjoint union of two infinite sets.

    The Fraenkel-Mostowski construction produces a Henkin (set-theoretic) model in which the Axiom of Choice fails and the relevant partition property fails.

    Modality & PossibilityTruth & Knowledge
    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

    No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Topics

    Modality & PossibilityTruth & Knowledge

    Connections

    1 topic

    All sources support it1 linked

    Related

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Browse more in Modality & Possibility
    Related propositions within the same area of thought.
    Lindenbaum and Mostowski (1938) established this result using the Fraenkel-Mosto...Zermelo's axioms for set theory are insufficient to prove the Axiom of Choice, o...

    Similar

    The Principle of Indifference leads to contradictory results when the ...76%The Axiom of Choice holds for collections of non-empty finite sets in ...76%The model construction for NFU can be replicated in terms of this endo...76%The Geach–Boolos model cannot be relied upon to secure the consistency...75%

    Source

    AI-extracted
    SEP: logic-higher-order
    View source passageHide passage
    For more on the proof theory of second-order logic, see Buss (1998). There is a translation of many sorted logic further to single sorted first order logic due essentially to Herbrand (1930), see also Wang (1952) and Schmidt (1951). This can be used to obtain many of the basic properties of first order logic first for many sorted logic and then further for second-order logic with general models. The most important application of general models is the Completeness Theorem: Theorem 14 (Henkin 1

    Details

    Type
    premise
    Perspectives
    0 (0 for, 0 against)
    Edits
    1 edit

    Open for perspectives

    This idea is waiting for its first supporting or challenging perspective.

    Share the first perspective