Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Logical incompatibility between foreknowledge and free wi... — Carmelics
    Home
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Challenges→There is a dilemma for anyone who wants to maintain both that there is a deity who infallibly knows the entire future and that human beings have libertarian free will.

    Logical incompatibility between foreknowledge and free will presupposes divine knowledge is temporally antecedent, which timeless eternity denies.

    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.
    1 reason for
    1 reason against

    Reasons For

    1 perspective
    Reason for
    ?
    • 1.Temporal priority requires the prior event to causally constrain later events, making foreknowledge incompatible with genuine agency.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.Timeless eternity places divine knowledge outside temporal sequence, so God's knowing doesn't precede or determine human choices.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.The incompatibility problem dissolves when foreknowledge isn't temporally ordered relative to free choices.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Reasons Against

    1 perspective
    Reason against
    ?
    • 1.Timeless knowledge still represents truths about what agents will freely do, raising the same necessity problem without temporal order.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.The claim that eternity escapes temporal logic merely relocates the problem rather than solving the underlying logical contradiction.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.If God timelessly knows p will occur, the truth of p seems logically necessary regardless of whether knowledge is temporally prior.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Strongest counterpoint
    Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.

    Key Terms

    knowledge(Distinguished from mere true belief, which may be the product of indoctrination and need not exercise deliberative capacities.)
    Justified true belief — true belief that has been arrived at through the exercise of deliberative capacities, including comparison of and deliberation among alternatives.

    Connections

    1 topic

    Free Will & Foreknowledge1 linked

    Related

    If God timelessly knows p will occur, the truth of p seems logically necessary r...Temporal priority requires the prior event to causally constrain later events, m...The claim that eternity escapes temporal logic merely relocates the problem rath...The incompatibility problem dissolves when foreknowledge isn't temporally ordere...
    +3 moreShow less
    There is a dilemma for anyone who wants to maintain both that there is a deity w...Timeless eternity places divine knowledge outside temporal sequence, so God's kn...Timeless knowledge still represents truths about what agents will freely do, rai...

    Details

    Type
    claim
    Perspectives
    2 (1 for, 1 against)
    Edits
    1 edit