Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Home/Original/inverse
    See Original
    Inverse View

    It is not the case that Lon Fuller's internal morality of law identifies procedural ideals law must meet, but these are compatibility constraints, not evidence of substantive unified purpose.

    ?Set your confidence on the premises below to see your aggregate.

    Reasons For

    1 perspective
    Reason for
    ?
    • 1.Fuller's principles presuppose values like fairness and accessibility, suggesting procedural ideals already embed substantive commitments about human dignity.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.Calling procedures mere 'compatibility constraints' obscures that they actively constitute what makes something recognizably law rather than coercion.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.Fuller treated legal coherence and rule-of-law as goods worth pursuing, implying procedural ideals express unified purposes beyond neutral compatibility.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Reasons Against

    1 perspective
    Reason against
    ?
    • 1.Fuller's eight principles (publicity, clarity, consistency) function as minimal structural requirements for any legal system regardless of its substantive goals.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.A tyranny can satisfy Fuller's procedural ideals while pursuing evil ends, showing procedures constrain but don't determine normative purpose.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.Fuller himself distinguished between the internal morality enabling law's function and the external morality governing which laws should exist.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Strongest counterpoint
    Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.