Skip to content
Carmelics
Topics
Thinkers
Changes
Contributors
Loading account…
Statements
321,452
Perspectives
108,905
Topics
42
Home
/
Original
/
inverse
See Original
Inverse View
It is not the case that Loudspeakers produce numerically distinct sound events from the original source event, so the hearer perceives a different sound, not the original one.
?
Set your confidence on the premises below to see your aggregate.
Reasons For
1 perspective
Reason for
?
1.
Numerical distinctness of physical events doesn't entail distinctness of what is perceived; we perceive the musical work, not sound-waves-in-themselves.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
Reproduction systems can preserve the perceptually relevant acoustic properties that constitute hearing 'the same sound' in ordinary meaning.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
3.
The claim conflates identity of the sound source with identity of the sound experienced; these are distinct properties with different criteria.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Reasons Against
1 perspective
Reason against
?
1.
Numerical identity requires spatiotemporal continuity; loudspeaker sound occurs at a different location and time than the original source event.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
Sound waves from loudspeakers have different physical properties (frequency response, phase relationships) than the original source's waves.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
3.
If two events are numerically distinct, perceiving one cannot be perceiving the other, regardless of causal or qualitative similarity.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Next step
Based on where you are in your exploration
Strongest counterpoint
Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.