Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Home/Original/inverse
    See Original
    Inverse View

    It is not the case that Luther and theological determinists like Schleiermacher held that an act can be genuinely predicated of a creature while God remains its sole sufficient originating cause.

    ?Set your confidence on the premises below to see your aggregate.

    Reasons For

    1 perspective
    Reason for
    ?
    • 1.If God is the sole sufficient cause, no additional creaturely cause is needed; positing one violates causal parsimony.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.An act cannot satisfy both 'genuinely predicated of creature' and 'God alone sufficiently causes it' without equivocation on agency.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.This position rescues divine omnipotence only by abandoning meaningful creaturely freedom, making responsibility attribution incoherent.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Reasons Against

    1 perspective
    Reason against
    ?
    • 1.Divine causation and creaturely causation operate on different metaphysical levels, so both can be complete without contradiction.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.Scripture attributes moral responsibility and praise/blame to creatures, which presupposes genuine agency independent of determinism.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.God's causation of an act through a creature's will constitutes the creature's own willing, not external compulsion of it.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Strongest counterpoint
    Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42