Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Machamer, Darden, and Craver's mechanistic explanation de... — Carmelics
    Home
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Supports→There need not be a conceptual path from concepts or predicates of the reducing science to concepts or predicates of the reduced science for an explanation to count as a reduction.

    Machamer, Darden, and Craver's mechanistic explanation demonstrates that inter-level reduction proceeds via mechanism schemas, not conceptual-definitional linkage between predicates.

    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

    No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Key Terms

    Conceptual-definitional linkage(as an alternative explanation method being contrasted with mechanism schemas)
    The idea of connecting concepts by formally defining one in terms of another, like saying 'a bachelor' is definitionally linked to 'an unmarried man.'
    Inter-level reduction(as a philosophical concept about explanation)
    The process of explaining something at one level of organization (like human behavior) by breaking it down into smaller, more basic levels (like brain chemistry or individual neurons).
    Machamer, Darden, and Craver(as the originators of mechanistic philosophy of science)
    Three contemporary philosophers of science who developed an influential theory about how scientific explanations work, particularly in biology. They argued that good explanations need to show how things actually work at different scales, not just list what stuff is made of.
    Mechanism schemas(as the means by which complex things are explained)

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Explore a random proposition
    Start fresh with something unrelated.
    General templates or blueprints for how mechanisms work—a reusable pattern that describes what parts are involved and how they interact to produce a result.
    Predicates(in logic and philosophy of language)
    Words or phrases that describe properties or characteristics of something—like 'is red' or 'is tall' in the sentence 'The ball is red.'
    mechanistic explanation(Philosophy of science, distinct from physics-centered models)
    A form of explanation where the functioning of a complex entity is explained in terms of the coordinated activation of its constituents, tied to a hierarchical order of local mechanisms whose constituents can themselves become the target of further mechanistic explanation, and organized to do something

    Connections

    2 topics

    Truth & Knowledge1 linkedConsciousness & Mind1 linked

    Related

    There need not be a conceptual path from concepts or predicates of the reducing ...

    Details

    Type
    claim
    Perspectives
    0 (0 for, 0 against)
    Edits
    1 edit

    Open for perspectives

    This idea is waiting for its first supporting or challenging perspective.

    Share the first perspective