Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Mathematical and logical truths demonstrate meaning-based... — Carmelics
    Home
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Challenges→Quine's critique of analyticity shows that no non-trivial universal generalization is insulated from empirical revision by meaning alone.

    Mathematical and logical truths demonstrate meaning-based insulation: no empirical discovery could make 'if p then p' false without changing what we mean by the logical connectives.

    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

    No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Key Terms

    Empirical discovery(as used in epistemology)
    A fact learned through observation and experimentation rather than through logic or reasoning alone.
    Mathematical and logical truths(as used in logic and epistemology)
    Facts that are always true regardless of what happens in the physical world—like 2+2=4 or 'something cannot be both A and not-A at the same time.'
    Meaning-based insulation(as used in philosophy of logic and language)
    The property of being protected from change by facts about the world because the statement's truth depends entirely on what the words mean, not on how things actually are.
    logical connectives(in logic and philosophy of language)
    Words or symbols that join statements together, like 'and', 'or', and 'if...then'. They determine how the truth of combined statements depends on the truth of each part.

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Explore a random proposition
    Start fresh with something unrelated.
    p (in 'if p then p')(as used in logic and symbolic reasoning)
    A placeholder variable representing any statement or claim; philosophers use letters like 'p' to talk about the structure of arguments without picking a specific example.

    Connections

    1 linked claim

    Quine's critique of analyticity shows that no non-trivial universal generalizati...

    Related

    Quine's critique of analyticity shows that no non-trivial universal generalizati...

    Details

    Type
    premise
    Perspectives
    0 (0 for, 0 against)

    Open for perspectives

    This idea is waiting for its first supporting or challenging perspective.

    Share the first perspective