Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Quine's critique of analyticity shows that no non-trivial... — Carmelics
    Home
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Challenges→The proposition 'Every German philosopher is European' is universally valid with respect to the idea [philosopher]

    Quine's critique of analyticity shows that no non-trivial universal generalization is insulated from empirical revision by meaning alone.

    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.
    1 reason for
    1 reason against

    Reasons For

    1 perspective
    Reason for
    ?
    • 1.Quine showed through thought experiments that statements like 'bachelors are unmarried' can be abandoned if empirical evidence sufficiently pressures our total belief system.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.The analytic/synthetic distinction assumes meaning determines truth independently of experience, but meaning itself is holistically determined by our entire network of beliefs.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.If a statement's truth could be insulated by meaning alone, we couldn't explain why we revise even central logical and mathematical beliefs under empirical pressure.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Reasons Against

    1 perspective
    Reason against
    ?
    • 1.Some statements like 'triangles have three sides' appear analytically true by definition regardless of holistic belief revision—their negation seems conceptually incoherent.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.Quine's holism conflates *practical revisability* (we could revise anything) with *conceptual insulation from experience*, which are distinct properties.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.Mathematical and logical truths demonstrate meaning-based insulation: no empirical discovery could make 'if p then p' false without changing what we mean by the logical connectives.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Strongest counterpoint
    Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.

    Connections

    1 topic

    Philosophy of Language1 linked

    Related

    If a statement's truth could be insulated by meaning alone, we couldn't explain ...Mathematical and logical truths demonstrate meaning-based insulation: no empiric...Quine showed through thought experiments that statements like 'bachelors are unm...Quine's holism conflates *practical revisability* (we could revise anything) wit...
    +3 moreShow less
    Some statements like 'triangles have three sides' appear analytically true by de...The analytic/synthetic distinction assumes meaning determines truth independentl...The proposition 'Every German philosopher is European' is universally valid with...

    Details

    Type
    claim
    Perspectives
    2 (1 for, 1 against)
    Edits
    1 edit