Skip to content
Carmelics
Topics
Thinkers
Changes
Contributors
Loading account…
Statements
321,452
Perspectives
108,905
Topics
42
Home
/
Original
/
inverse
See Original
Inverse View
It is not the case that Matter has never come into existence but is co-eternal with God, yet distinct from God.
?
Set your confidence on the premises below to see your aggregate.
Reasons For
2 perspectives
Reason for 1 of 2
?
1.
Plotinus argues that matter, as pure privation and non-being, cannot be co-eternal with the One without introducing an uncaused dualistic principle.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
A co-eternal matter constrains divine omnipotence by positing an independent substrate God did not produce, violating the Neoplatonic principle of unified causation.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Reason for 2 of 2
?
1.
Augustine contends in Confessions XII that formless matter is itself created ex nihilo, since existence of any kind requires a divine source.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
If matter is unlimited and indefinite as P2 claims, it possesses no ontological ground for its own eternal subsistence independent of a sustaining cause.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Reasons Against
1 perspective
Reason against
?
1.
A literal interpretation of Plato's Timaeus requires that matter is not created.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
Matter is unlimited, indefinite, without form and quality.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
3.
Co-eternal entities are distinct from the divine principle while sharing existence without temporal origin.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Next step
Based on where you are in your exploration
Strongest counterpoint
Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.