Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Maximin reasoning, which Rawls endorses for the original ... — Carmelics
    Home
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Challenges→No party behind the veil of ignorance can press for principles that arbitrarily favor the particular citizen they represent.

    Maximin reasoning, which Rawls endorses for the original position, itself encodes a particular attitude toward risk that arbitrarily privileges the worst-off over other distributions.

    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

    No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Key Terms

    Attitude toward risk(as used in decision-making and ethics)
    How willing you are to accept uncertainty or the possibility of bad outcomes when making a decision—some people are risk-averse (cautious) while others are risk-tolerant (willing to gamble).
    Maximin reasoning(as a philosophical approach to making choices)
    A decision-making strategy where you choose the option that gives you the best worst-case outcome, rather than chasing the biggest average payoff.
    Rawls(as the philosopher whose ideas are being referenced)
    John Rawls, a 20th-century philosopher famous for developing theories about justice and fairness in society.
    original position(Rawls's device for deriving principles of justice through impartial rational choice.)
    A hypothetical deliberative situation in which parties choose principles of justice without knowledge of their particular place in society.

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Explore a random proposition
    Start fresh with something unrelated.
    worst-off(as a group of people whose interests matter in judging fairness)
    The people in society who have the least money, power, or resources—those in the most difficult situation.

    Connections

    2 topics

    Social Contract1 linkedDemocracy & Governance1 linked

    Related

    No party behind the veil of ignorance can press for principles that arbitrarily ...

    Details

    Type
    claim
    Perspectives
    0 (0 for, 0 against)
    Edits
    1 edit

    Open for perspectives

    This idea is waiting for its first supporting or challenging perspective.

    Share the first perspective