Skip to content
Carmelics
Topics
Thinkers
Changes
Contributors
Loading account…
Statements
321,452
Perspectives
108,905
Topics
42
Home
/
Original
/
inverse
See Original
Inverse View
It is not the case that Memory continuity as a necessary condition for personal identity is not trivially uninformative.
?
Set your confidence on the premises below to see your aggregate.
Reasons For
2 perspectives
Reason for 1 of 2
?
1.
Reid's objection shows memory criteria are circular: remembering an action presupposes being the person who performed it.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
A necessary condition that cannot be verified without presupposing the identity it grounds collapses into uninformativeness.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Reason for 2 of 2
?
1.
Shoemaker and Parfit demonstrate that psychological continuity, not episodic memory specifically, does the real explanatory work in personal identity.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
If memory is merely a contingent indicator of deeper psychological connectedness, its necessity condition status is derivative and thus trivially borrowed from a more fundamental criterion.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Reasons Against
1 perspective
Reason against
?
1.
We can know that a corpse resulting from a person's death cannot remember any events from that person's life without already knowing whether the corpse is identical to that person.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
Necessary conditions can be verified independently of knowing the identity relation holds, unlike sufficient conditions in this case.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Next step
Based on where you are in your exploration
Strongest counterpoint
Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.