Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Miller himself marshals these considerations only in supp... — Carmelics
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Home/Rights & Liberty
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Challenges→Neither the protection argument nor the ethical community argument is sufficient to ground a general right of all nations to full independence and a unilateral right to secede

    Miller himself marshals these considerations only in support of the weaker conclusion that nations have a strong claim to self-determination

    Democracy & GovernanceRights & Liberty
    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

    No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Topics

    Rights & LibertyDemocracy & Governance

    Related

    Both considerations can weigh in favor of some form of political self-determinat...Miller does not specify when the strong claim constitutes a full-fledged rightNeither the protection argument nor the ethical community argument is sufficient...

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Browse more in Rights & Liberty
    Related propositions within the same area of thought.

    Similar

    Both considerations can weigh in favor of some form of political self-...83%African nations have not achieved full national independence and self-...74%Seeking a conciliatory form of settler-state recognition for Indigenou...74%Depending on oppressors for freedom and self-worth does not produce ge...74%

    Source

    AI-extracted
    SEP: secession
    View source passageHide passage
    The first type of argument has two variants: One can argue that nations need to have their own states, either (1) in order to be able to protect themselves from destruction or from forces that threaten their distinctive character, or (2) in order for co-nationals to have the institutional resources to be able to fulfill the special obligations they owe one another as members of an “ethical community”, in Miller’s phrase. Both of these considerations can, under certain circumstances, weigh in fav

    Details

    Type
    premise
    Perspectives
    0 (0 for, 0 against)
    Edits
    1 edit

    Open for perspectives

    This idea is waiting for its first supporting or challenging perspective.

    Share the first perspective