Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Miracles grounded in probabilistic reasoning can still be... — Carmelics
    Home/Religious Experience
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Supports→The probabilistic basis of miracle-belief does not undermine the divinity of miracles or revelation

    Miracles grounded in probabilistic reasoning can still be credible

    Natural TheologyReligious Experience
    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

    No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Topics

    Religious ExperienceNatural Theology

    Related

    Credibility of miracles can have certain advantages for accepting divine revelat...The probabilistic basis of miracle-belief does not undermine the divinity of mir...

    Similar

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Browse more in Religious Experience
    Related propositions within the same area of thought.
    A successful confirmatory probabilistic argument may shift the burden ...78%The objection that probabilistic arguments are only of interest when f...78%A confirmatory probabilistic argument, if successful, establishes a su...77%The probabilistic basis of miracle-belief does not undermine the divin...75%

    Source

    AI-extracted
    SEP: bolzano
    View source passageHide passage
    A question in regard to which Bolzano adopted an especially interesting position was the problem of miracles. According to the traditional view, they are supernatural events or even immediate effects of God. Sometimes this is understood in the sense that miracles are events which are not explainable by means of the laws of nature or even incompatible with these laws. This view, however, has to face serious problems as Bolzano has painfully made clear (cf. RW I, 422–439, especially 424–436). Bolz

    Details

    Type
    premise
    Perspectives
    0 (0 for, 0 against)
    Edits
    1 edit

    Open for perspectives

    This idea is waiting for its first supporting or challenging perspective.

    Share the first perspective