Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Moral blameworthiness can be located in the greater commu... — Carmelics
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Home/Moral Responsibility
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Supports→Dissenters can be morally blameworthy even if they cannot control the system that implicates them in evil.

    Moral blameworthiness can be located in the greater community of which the individual is a part, rather than in the will of the discrete individual.

    Moral Responsibility
    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

    No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Topics

    Moral Responsibility

    Connections

    1 topic

    Justice & Punishment2 linked

    Related

    Dissenters can be morally blameworthy even if they cannot control the system tha...

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Browse more in Moral Responsibility
    Related propositions within the same area of thought.
    Moral blameworthiness need not require that the blameworthy individual control t...

    Similar

    Moral blameworthiness need not require that the blameworthy individual...86%Moving beyond individual moral blameworthiness allows groups to be und...81%Backward-looking collective responsibility is morally salient because ...78%Moral blameworthiness requires that the action in question concerns a ...78%

    Source

    AI-extracted
    SEP: collective-responsibility
    View source passageHide passage
    Raikka claims in this context that dissenters can be morally blameworthy even if they cannot control the system that implicates them in evil. Hence, he finds it necessary to do two things that not only place him squarely in the camp of Karl Jaspers and other advocates of metaphysical guilt but that are very telling with respect to contemporary philosophical debates about collective responsibility in general. The first is to subtract from the set of conventionally invoked criteria of collective r

    Details

    Type
    premise
    Perspectives
    0 (0 for, 0 against)
    Edits
    1 edit

    Open for perspectives

    This idea is waiting for its first supporting or challenging perspective.

    Share the first perspective