Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Moral constraints derive their force from consequences fo... — Carmelics
    Home
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Challenges→There are absolute constraints on the subjective ends we may set, the means we may use, and how we may treat persons.

    Moral constraints derive their force from consequences for welfare, not from the intrinsic status of persons as ends.

    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.
    1 reason for
    1 reason against

    Reasons For

    1 perspective
    Reason for
    ?
    • 1.Moral intuitions about harm align with welfare consequences: we condemn torture because it causes suffering, not due to abstract dignity.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.Competing moral claims become resolvable only by reference to welfare outcomes; intrinsic status provides no decision procedure.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.Persons lacking capacity for welfare (unconscious beings) lack moral standing, suggesting welfare, not personhood, grounds moral consideration.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Reasons Against

    1 perspective
    Reason against
    ?
    • 1.Some acts violate persons fundamentally (slavery, genocide) regardless of aggregate welfare; consequentialism permits them if benefits suffice.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.The intrinsic wrongness of treating persons as mere tools is independent of outcomes; we owe duties to individuals as ends, not receptacles.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.Welfare is itself derivative from respect for persons' autonomy and rights; consequences matter *because* persons matter intrinsically.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Strongest counterpoint
    Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.

    Connections

    2 topics

    Rights & Liberty1 linkedMoral Responsibility1 linked

    Related

    Competing moral claims become resolvable only by reference to welfare outcomes; ...Moral intuitions about harm align with welfare consequences: we condemn torture ...Persons lacking capacity for welfare (unconscious beings) lack moral standing, s...Some acts violate persons fundamentally (slavery, genocide) regardless of aggreg...
    +3 moreShow less
    The intrinsic wrongness of treating persons as mere tools is independent of outc...There are absolute constraints on the subjective ends we may set, the means we m...Welfare is itself derivative from respect for persons' autonomy and rights; cons...

    Details

    Type
    claim
    Perspectives
    2 (1 for, 1 against)
    Edits
    1 edit