Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    More frequent interaction with the majority during bargai... — Carmelics
    Home/Justice & Punishment
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Supports→Minority group members are systematically disadvantaged in bargaining exchanges due to their lower interaction frequency with in-group members

    More frequent interaction with the majority during bargaining leads to worse outcomes for the minority group

    Justice & PunishmentSocial Contract
    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

    No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Topics

    Justice & PunishmentSocial Contract

    Connections

    1 topic

    Consequentialism1 linked

    Related

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Browse more in Justice & Punishment
    Related propositions within the same area of thought.
    In a Nash demand game, outcomes are shaped by the frequency of interactions betw...Minority group members are systematically disadvantaged in bargaining exchanges ...Minority group members interact more frequently with majority members than with ...

    Similar

    Minority group members are systematically disadvantaged in bargaining ...82%Minority group members interact more frequently with majority members ...78%When Fairmen preferentially interact with other Fairmen, Fairmen on av...69%Contractarian theory requires that bargaining conditions be fair to yi...69%

    Source

    AI-extracted
    SEP: computational-philosophy
    View source passageHide passage
    There is also a new body of work that extends game-theoretic modeling and simulation to questions of social inequity. Bruner (2017) shows that the mere fact that one group is a minority in a population, and thus interacts more frequently with majority than with minority members, can result in its being disadvantaged where exchanges are characterized by bargaining in a Nash demand game (Young 1993). Termed the “cultural Red King”, the effect has been further explored through simulation, with link

    Details

    Type
    premise
    Perspectives
    0 (0 for, 0 against)
    Edits
    1 edit

    Open for perspectives

    This idea is waiting for its first supporting or challenging perspective.

    Share the first perspective