Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Home/Original/inverse
    See Original
    Inverse View

    It is not the case that Motion, under strict relationism, exists only as a relative difference among bodies rather than as an individual, determinate property of each body.

    ?Set your confidence on the premises below to see your aggregate.

    Reasons For

    2 perspectives
    Reason for 1 of 2
    ?
    • 1.Newton's rotating bucket argument demonstrates that concave water-surface curvature persists even when no relative motion between water and bucket exists.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.If motion were purely relational, no mechanical effect could distinguish absolute rotation from rest, yet centrifugal effects empirically appear.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.Therefore, at least some motions must be grounded in something beyond pairwise body-relations, undermining strict relationism's completeness.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Reason for 2 of 2
    ?
    • 1.Leibniz's own dynamics required attributing living force (vis viva) intrinsically to individual bodies, not merely to body-pairs in relation.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.A quantity that is conserved within a single body across interactions cannot be coherently defined as a purely relational difference between bodies.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.Strict relationism thus conflicts with the very dynamical framework its most sophisticated early defender used to ground physical explanation.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Reasons Against

    1 perspective
    Reason against
    ?
    • 1.According to the relational theory, space, time, and motion are just relations among bodies and not separately existing entities or properties independent of material bodies.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.All that really exists is a difference in relative speed, velocity, and acceleration among bodies, not individual speed properties possessed by each body.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Strongest counterpoint
    Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.