Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Natural theologians identify general facts about a topic ... — Carmelics
    Home/Natural Theology
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Challenges→Natural theologians commit the fallacy of understated evidence when arguing for omni-theism over source physicalism.

    Natural theologians identify general facts about a topic that are more probable given omni-theism than given source physicalism.

    Natural Theology
    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

    No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Topics

    Natural Theology

    Connections

    2 topics

    Skepticism3 linkedTruth & Knowledge1 linked

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Browse more in Natural Theology
    Related propositions within the same area of thought.

    Related

    Ignoring relevant specific evidence that offsets general evidence constitutes un...Natural theologians commit the fallacy of understated evidence when arguing for ...Natural theologians ignore more specific facts about those same topics that, giv...

    Similar

    Some general facts about certain topics are more probable given omni-t...94%Natural theologians ignore more specific facts about those same topics...94%More specific facts about those same topics, conditioned on the genera...91%The evidential force of general facts favoring omni-theism over source...88%

    Source

    AI-extracted
    SEP: atheism-agnosticism
    View source passageHide passage
    A thorough examination of the arguments for and against premise (1) is obviously impossible here, but it is worth mentioning that a defense of this premise need not claim that the known facts typically thought by natural theologians to favor omni-theism over competing hypotheses like source physicalism have no force. Instead, it could be claimed that whatever force they have is offset at least to some significant degree by more specific facts favoring source physicalism over omni-theism. Natural

    Details

    Type
    premise
    Perspectives
    0 (0 for, 0 against)
    Edits
    1 edit

    Open for perspectives

    This idea is waiting for its first supporting or challenging perspective.

    Share the first perspective