Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Home/Original/inverse
    See Original
    Inverse View

    It is not the case that Nature and mind are identical — not merely reciprocally dependent — such that nature is mind made visible and mind is invisible nature.

    ?Set your confidence on the premises below to see your aggregate.

    Reasons For

    2 perspectives
    Reason for 1 of 2
    ?
    • 1.Nature exhibits causal powers and structural regularities that obtain independently of any mind's conceptual activity.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.If nature were literally identical to mind, natural laws could not explain why minds are constrained by empirical reality rather than constituting it freely.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.Schelling's identity thesis conflates epistemic interdependence with ontological identity, a fallacy Kant's transcendental idealism explicitly avoids.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Reason for 2 of 2
    ?
    • 1.The existence of unfossilized evolutionary history predating any finite or absolute mind entails a nature that was real before mind emerged.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.Meillassoux's 'arche-fossil' argument demonstrates that correlationist identity claims cannot coherently account for an ancestral reality prior to givenness.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Reasons Against

    1 perspective
    Reason against
    ?
    • 1.The system of nature is at the same time the system of our mind.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.Nature and mind, matter and concept are the same in the sense that one is the other and vice versa, not merely correlated while retaining independent reality.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.Finite minds are forced by natural predisposition to distinguish 'outside us' from 'in us', but this distinction is a feature of perspective, not of reality itself.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Strongest counterpoint
    Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.