Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Necessarily, if R has C as a conjunct, then R has C as a ... — Carmelics
    Home/Divine Attributes
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Supports→If R has C as a conjunct, then R cannot be what it is without having exactly the conjuncts it in fact has (an analog of mereological essentialism holds for conjunctive properties).

    Necessarily, if R has C as a conjunct, then R has C as a conjunct.

    Divine Attributes
    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

    No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Topics

    Divine Attributes

    Related

    If R has C as a conjunct, then R cannot be what it is without having exactly the...

    Similar

    If R has C as a conjunct, then R cannot be what it is without having e...86%

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Browse more in Divine Attributes
    Related propositions within the same area of thought.
    Le Grand holds that the Divine Will and Intellect are one.78%
    Definition (D3) is equivalent to definition (D1).77%
    But then God would not be absolute.75%

    Source

    AI-extracted
    SEP: divine-simplicity

    Details

    Type
    premise
    Perspectives
    0 (0 for, 0 against)
    Edits
    1 edit

    Open for perspectives

    This idea is waiting for its first supporting or challenging perspective.

    Share the first perspective