Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Non-deserved suffering is inherently bad, but deserved su... — Carmelics
    Home/Justice & Punishment
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Supports→Deserved suffering inflicted by a proper punitive desert agent is inherently good.

    Non-deserved suffering is inherently bad, but deserved suffering should be distinguished from non-deserved suffering.

    Justice & Punishment
    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

    No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Topics

    Justice & Punishment

    Related

    Deserved suffering inflicted by a proper punitive desert agent is inherently goo...Given that a wrong has been committed, inflicting deserved suffering in response...Just as grief is good and morally valuable when a loved one has died, suffering ...

    Similar

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Browse more in Justice & Punishment
    Related propositions within the same area of thought.
    Given that a wrong has been committed, inflicting deserved suffering i...84%Just as grief is good and morally valuable when a loved one has died, ...82%Saying punishment is intended to inflict pain or suffering suggests th...80%Punishment should not be understood as intended to inflict pain or suf...79%

    Source

    AI-extracted
    SEP: justice-retributive
    View source passageHide passage
    The desert object has already been discussed in section 2.1: punishment. There is, of course, much to be said about what punishments are deserved for what wrongs. I highlight here two issues that are particularly salient for retributivists. First, is the question of whether the retributivist can justify inflicting hard treatment in addition to censure—see section 3.5 and section 5. This is tied to the normative status of suffering, which is discussed in section 4.3. Second, is the challenge of identifying proportional punishments—discussed in section 4.4.

    Details

    Type
    premise
    Perspectives
    0 (0 for, 0 against)
    Edits
    1 edit

    Open for perspectives

    This idea is waiting for its first supporting or challenging perspective.

    Share the first perspective