Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Nothing can be explanatory of an agent's action independe... — Carmelics
    Home/Moral Responsibility
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Challenges→No motivationally external considerations could genuinely be practical reasons for an agent.

    Nothing can be explanatory of an agent's action independently of the contents of the agent's motivational set — that is, independently of the agent's desires and dispositions.

    Moral ResponsibilityPhilosophy of Language
    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

    No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Topics

    Moral ResponsibilityPhilosophy of Language

    Connections

    2 topics

    Truth & Knowledge1 linked

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Browse more in Moral Responsibility
    Related propositions within the same area of thought.
    Virtue Ethics
    1 linked

    Related

    For an external reasons belief to be true, the consideration R must actually exp...For external reasons to exist, it must be possible that external reasons beliefs...If a consideration cannot explain an agent's action, it cannot be a genuine prac...No motivationally external considerations could genuinely be practical reasons f...

    Similar

    Therefore, there must be reasons that are independent of agents' desir...82%If an agent can be irrational or vicious due to lacking certain desire...82%The motivations of agents are fundamentally self-directed.81%In a Bratman case, the agent's actions are driven by intentions to try...81%

    Source

    AI-extracted
    SEP: reasons-internal-external
    View source passageHide passage
    According to this reading, the problem Williams sees for external reasons is the following. For there genuinely to be external reasons, he observes, it must be possible that some such external reasons beliefs are true. This requires that the consideration R which an agent accepts as his reason must actually be a genuine explanation of his acting under the condition of sound deliberation, independently of any facts about his motivational set. But this condition cannot be met, because nothing cou

    Details

    Type
    premise
    Perspectives
    0 (0 for, 0 against)
    Edits
    1 edit

    Open for perspectives

    This idea is waiting for its first supporting or challenging perspective.

    Share the first perspective