Skip to content
Carmelics
Topics
Thinkers
Changes
Contributors
Loading account…
Statements
321,452
Perspectives
108,905
Topics
42
Home
/
Original
/
inverse
See Original
Inverse View
It is not the case that Omniscience might involve more than knowledge of propositions.
?
Set your confidence on the premises below to see your aggregate.
Reasons For
2 perspectives
Reason for 1 of 2
?
1.
All experiential knowledge can be fully captured by complete propositional descriptions of phenomenal states, including indexical and perspectival propositions.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
Mary's Room and related knowledge arguments confuse epistemic access with ontological novelty, not genuine non-propositional knowledge.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Reason for 2 of 2
?
1.
Lewis's analysis of knowing-what-it's-like as knowing centered worlds reduces phenomenal knowledge to a species of propositional knowledge about self-locating facts.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
If divine omniscience already includes all true propositions including self-locating ones, omnisubjectivity adds no distinct cognitive category beyond complete propositional knowledge.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Reasons Against
1 perspective
Reason against
?
1.
Grasping someone's subjective experience seems not to be propositional.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
God's omnisubjectivity involves consciously grasping with perfect accuracy and completeness the first-person perspective of every conscious being.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Next step
Based on where you are in your exploration
Strongest counterpoint
Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.