On hylomorphic anthropology, God's resurrection of the person requires reconstituting the same matter-form composite, making 'transfer' a category error rather than a genuine requirement.

?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.

Category error(as used in logic and philosophy of language): A logical mistake where you apply a rule or concept to something it doesn't actually fit, like using a math formula on a poem.
Hylomorphic anthropology(as the main framework being discussed): A philosophical view about what humans are made of, based on the idea that we're composed of two things: matter (our physical body) and form (the organizing principle or soul that makes us 'us'). It comes from ancient Greek philosophy and asks whether you need both your original body AND your soul to be the same person.
Matter-form composite(as the essential components of a person in hylomorphic thinking): The combination of physical material (like the atoms in your body) and the organizing principle (often called a 'form' or 'soul') that gives that material structure and life. Think of it like clay shaped into a statue—the clay is the matter, and the shape is the form.
Reconstituting(as what God would need to do for resurrection in hylomorphic thought)

Based on where you are in your exploration