Skip to content
Carmelics
Topics
Thinkers
Changes
Contributors
Loading account…
Statements
321,452
Perspectives
108,905
Topics
42
Home
/
Original
/
inverse
See Original
Inverse View
It is not the case that On immanent realist accounts (Armstrong, Loux), universals are wholly present at each instance location, not merely constituents abstracted from location.
?
Set your confidence on the premises below to see your aggregate.
Reasons For
1 perspective
Reason for
?
1.
If universals are wholly present at multiple locations, they must exist in multiple places simultaneously, violating standard spatial principles.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
Properties like shape differ between instances (square vs. round), so the universal itself cannot be wholly present unchanged in each.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
3.
Wholly present universals require explaining how one entity avoids multiplying into distinct spatiotemporal parts at each location.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Reasons Against
1 perspective
Reason against
?
1.
If universals are abstract, they cannot causally interact with physical instances, yet properties seem to have causal powers at each location.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
Wholly present universals avoid the problem of explaining how scattered instances share a single entity without spatial continuity.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
3.
Direct acquaintance with redness in this tomato suggests the universal itself is present here, not merely a constituent abstracted away.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Next step
Based on where you are in your exploration
Strongest counterpoint
Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.