Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    On Leibnizian optimalism, God's perfect rationality and g... — Carmelics
    Home
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Challenges→Premise (3) is plausible.

    On Leibnizian optimalism, God's perfect rationality and goodness necessitate actualizing the best possible world, which may logically require evils as constitutive goods.

    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.
    1 reason for
    1 reason against

    Reasons For

    1 perspective
    Reason for
    ?
    • 1.A perfect God cannot act irrationally; rational agents choose actions that best achieve their ends given constraints.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.Some goods logically require their contrasts (courage needs danger, forgiveness needs wrongdoing) to exist as actualized virtues.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.If the actual world contains more total goodness than any alternative God could create, then creating it fulfills divine perfection.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Reasons Against

    1 perspective
    Reason against
    ?
    • 1.Evils like childhood cancer don't constitute necessary contrasts for goods—omnipotent beings could create virtues without gratuitous suffering.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.The claim that this is 'the best possible world' remains empirically unverifiable; we cannot compare actual world goodness to infinite alternatives.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.Even if some evils serve greater goods, the quantity and intensity of suffering exceeds what rational cost-benefit analysis could justify.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Strongest counterpoint
    Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.

    Connections

    1 topic

    Problem of Evil1 linked

    Related

    A perfect God cannot act irrationally; rational agents choose actions that best ...Even if some evils serve greater goods, the quantity and intensity of suffering ...Evils like childhood cancer don't constitute necessary contrasts for goods—omnip...If the actual world contains more total goodness than any alternative God could ...
    +3 moreShow less
    Premise (3) is plausible.Some goods logically require their contrasts (courage needs danger, forgiveness ...The claim that this is 'the best possible world' remains empirically unverifiabl...

    Details

    Type
    claim
    Perspectives
    2 (1 for, 1 against)
    Edits
    1 edit