Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    On this theory, ideas of objects are signs of God's plan ... — Carmelics
    Home/Divine Attributes
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Supports→One must accept idealism if one accepts Berkeley's re-interpretation of causality as a relation of marks and signs between ideas.

    On this theory, ideas of objects are signs of God's plan for future possible ideas.

    Consciousness & MindDivine Attributes
    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

    No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Topics

    Divine AttributesConsciousness & Mind

    Connections

    1 topic

    Causation2 linked

    Related

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Browse more in Divine Attributes
    Related propositions within the same area of thought.
    Accepting this theory of causality and signs commits one to a world constituted ...Berkeley re-interprets causality as a purported relation between ideas, not betw...One must accept idealism if one accepts Berkeley's re-interpretation of causalit...

    Similar

    In Malebranche's view, ideas are exemplars in the mind of God after wh...79%It would be needless for God to give us our ideas indirectly by creati...78%The divine ideas are real objects in the mind of God.78%These divine ideas are real objects in the mind of God.78%

    Source

    AI-extracted
    SEP: idealism
    View source passageHide passage
    Berkeley’s criticism of Locke’s theory concerning substances is not carried out for its own sake. On the contrary, it is meant to establish what Berkeley thinks to be the unavoidable metaphysical consequences of a position that takes ideas “in the mind” to be the only material for the operations of the mind in its acquisition of knowledge. These metaphysical consequences consist in a thoroughgoing idealism or “immaterialism” with respect to the nature and constitution of things or substances. Be

    Details

    Type
    premise
    Perspectives
    0 (0 for, 0 against)
    Edits
    1 edit

    Open for perspectives

    This idea is waiting for its first supporting or challenging perspective.

    Share the first perspective