Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Once the entailment of the argument is established, all p... — Carmelics
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Home/Proof of definition segments
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Supports→All phenomena are empty of any intrinsic reality

    Once the entailment of the argument is established, all potential loopholes are addressed

    All sources support itProof of definition segments
    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

    No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Topics

    Proof of definition segmentsAll sources support it

    Connections

    3 topics

    Modality & Possibility4 linked

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Browse more in Proof of definition segments
    Related propositions within the same area of thought.
    Personal Identity
    2 linked
    Skepticism1 linked

    Related

    All phenomena are empty of any intrinsic realityAll phenomena lack any plural identityAll phenomena lack any singular identityThe second and third criteria are mutually entailing and together prove the neit...

    Similar

    The above proof of the intermediate value result can be read either as...68%Interpolation thus lies at the intersection of proof theory and model ...67%A logic whose validities are recursively enumerable satisfies abstract...66%Internal categoricity provides a bridge between full semantics and Hen...66%

    Source

    AI-extracted
    SEP: twotruths-india
    View source passageHide passage
    Thus the second and the third criteria which are mutually entailing prove the entailment of the neither one-nor many argument. Once the entailment[15] of the argument is accomplished, in Śāntarakṣita’s view, all potential loopholes in this argument are addressed. And therefore the argument successfully proves that all phenomena are empty of any intrinsic reality, since they all lack any singular or plural identity.

    Details

    Type
    premise
    Perspectives
    0 (0 for, 0 against)
    Edits
    1 edit

    Open for perspectives

    This idea is waiting for its first supporting or challenging perspective.

    Share the first perspective