Open theists like William Hasker deny infallible foreknowledge of free acts, but this constitutes a revision of classical theism, not a refutation of the dilemma's logical structure.
?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.
No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.
Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.
free acts(Kant's compatibilist taxonomy of event types in the New Elucidation)
Events that possess sufficient ability to withstand external forces, distinguished from necessary consequents by their degree of determining power
knowledge(Distinguished from mere true belief, which may be the product of indoctrination and need not exercise deliberative capacities.)
Justified true belief — true belief that has been arrived at through the exercise of deliberative capacities, including comparison of and deliberation among alternatives.
open theism(Philosophy of religion; proposed solution to the divine foreknowledge and free will problem)
The theological position that God does not have knowledge of future contingent events, either because no true propositions about such events currently exist, because such propositions cannot be known by anyone including God, or because God voluntarily refrains from knowing them to preserve human freedom.