Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    P6 — Carmelics
    Home
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Supports→P7 follows from the combination of the result that no form is in humans and P6

    P6

    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

    No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Connections

    3 topics

    Philosophy of Language2 linkedTruth & Knowledge1 linkedModality & Possibility1 linked

    Related

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Explore a random proposition
    Start fresh with something unrelated.
    If Y is a form, then Y is not in humansP7 follows from the combination of the result that no form is in humans and P6

    Similar

    SOME100%The Father loves the Son.87%Only the Trinity is God.85%Mortality is good.83%

    Source

    AI-extracted
    SEP: plato-parmenides
    View source passageHide passage
    Now, by P1, anything that is itself by itself is not in humans, and, by Separation, every form is itself by itself. Hence P1 and Separation entail that no form is in humans, i.e., that if Y is a form, then Y is not in humans. This result, taken together with P6, entails P7:

    Details

    Type
    premise
    Perspectives
    0 (0 for, 0 against)
    Edits
    1 edit

    Open for perspectives

    This idea is waiting for its first supporting or challenging perspective.

    Share the first perspective