Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Parfit's own argument in 'Reasons and Persons' shows that... — Carmelics
    Home
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Supports→The psychological-continuity view, as standardly stated, is false or incomplete.

    Parfit's own argument in 'Reasons and Persons' shows that what matters in survival is psychological continuity itself, not identity, revealing the view conflates two distinct normative and metaphysical questions.

    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

    No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Key Terms

    Conflates(in argumentation and logic)
    Treats two different things as if they're the same thing, or mixes them up in a way that causes confusion.
    Identity(Adams treats identity statements as a variety of atomic formula rather than a logical truth exempt from existence presuppositions)
    A relation between an object and itself, expressed as an atomic formula (a=a), subject to the same existence-entailment conditions as other atomic predicates under GSA
    Metaphysical question(contrasted with causal-historical questions)
    A question about what something fundamentally *is* or what actually exists in reality—in this case, what species really are at their core.
    Normative question(as contrasted with genetic questions about causation)
    A question about what should be true or what counts as right, proper, or justified—as opposed to what actually is the case.

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Explore a random proposition
    Start fresh with something unrelated.
    Parfit
    Derek Parfit was a highly influential British philosopher known for revolutionizing how we think about personal identity, morality, and what makes life worth living. He argued that our sense of being a continuous, unified "self" is partly an illusion, and that what really matters is the continuation of our thoughts and experiences, not some invisible thread connecting us through time. His ideas have shaped modern ethics and how philosophers approach questions about identity, responsibility, and how we should treat future generations.
    Reasons and Persons(as the source text)
    A landmark 1984 philosophy book by Derek Parfit that explores how we should live and make decisions, especially when our personal interests conflict with what's best for everyone.
    psychological continuity(Philosophy of personal identity)
    A relation holding between a person at one time and a being at a later time when the later being inherits the memories, intentions, beliefs, and psychological states of the earlier person.

    Connections

    1 topic

    Personal Identity1 linked

    Related

    The psychological-continuity view, as standardly stated, is false or incomplete.

    Details

    Type
    claim
    Perspectives
    0 (0 for, 0 against)
    Edits
    1 edit

    Open for perspectives

    This idea is waiting for its first supporting or challenging perspective.

    Share the first perspective