Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Pereboom's four-case manipulation argument shows that cau... — Carmelics
    Home
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Supports→Kane's appeal to indeterminate efforts of will and indeterminism does not help meet the luck objection against event-causal libertarianism

    Pereboom's four-case manipulation argument shows that causal histories structurally identical to deterministic ones inherit the same control deficits, and Kane's indeterminism merely substitutes causal gaps for causal inevitability.

    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

    No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Key Terms

    Causal gaps(as what indeterminism introduces instead of causal inevitability)
    Breaks or gaps in the chain of causes, where something happens without being completely caused by what came before.
    Causal inevitability(as what determinism creates)
    When something is completely bound to happen because of the prior causes that determine it; there's no way it could have been different.
    Control deficits(as what carries over between manipulated and determined scenarios)
    The ways in which someone lacks real control over their actions or decisions.
    Four-case manipulation argument(the specific argument being discussed)
    A thought experiment with four scenarios designed to show that our intuitions about free will break down when we examine them carefully.
    Kane

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Explore a random proposition
    Start fresh with something unrelated.
    (as an alternative approach to the free will problem)
    Robert Kane, a philosopher who defends free will by arguing that indeterminism (randomness) can actually be compatible with real human control.
    Pereboom(referring to the philosopher who created the manipulation argument)
    Derk Pereboom is a contemporary philosopher who argues that free will and moral responsibility might not exist, even though we feel like we make genuine choices.
    causal histories(describing different ways events could have unfolded to produce the same result)
    The chain of events and causes that led to something happening; the backstory of how something came to be.
    determinism(Discussion of classical mechanics, quantum mechanics, and general relativity)
    A property of physical theories concerning whether the laws governing a system fully fix future (and past) states given present conditions; admits of degrees ('fall only a bit short')
    indeterminism(implied by the text's classification of agent causation as a form of indeterminism)
    The view that there are certain events that are not fixed as a matter of natural law

    Connections

    2 topics

    Free Will & Foreknowledge1 linkedMoral Responsibility1 linked

    Related

    Kane's appeal to indeterminate efforts of will and indeterminism does not help m...

    Details

    Type
    claim
    Perspectives
    0 (0 for, 0 against)
    Edits
    1 edit

    Open for perspectives

    This idea is waiting for its first supporting or challenging perspective.

    Share the first perspective