Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Peter French's corporate internal decision structure (CID... — Carmelics
    Home
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Challenges→Collective moral responsibility can be unfair in particular cases, even if it is not inherently unfair.

    Peter French's corporate internal decision structure (CID) analysis shows collectives can be genuine moral agents independent of member awareness.

    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.
    1 reason for
    1 reason against

    Reasons For

    1 perspective
    Reason for
    ?
    • 1.Corporations have formal decision procedures (policies, chains of command) that generate actions independent of any single member's intent or knowledge.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.Moral agency requires intentional action and responsibility attribution; corporations satisfy both through their CID structures, just as persons do.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.We hold corporations legally and practically accountable as unified agents; denying moral agency contradicts our actual treatment of them.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Reasons Against

    1 perspective
    Reason against
    ?
    • 1.Moral agency requires consciousness or subjective experience; corporations lack these, making CID structure irrelevant to genuine agency.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.CID analysis conflates structural efficiency with moral responsibility; a system that produces harm is still reducible to individual choices within it.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.Member unawareness doesn't eliminate individual culpability; it merely obscures it—moral responsibility cannot float free of any conscious agent.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Strongest counterpoint
    Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.

    Connections

    2 topics

    Justice & Punishment1 linkedMoral Responsibility1 linked

    Related

    CID analysis conflates structural efficiency with moral responsibility; a system...Collective moral responsibility can be unfair in particular cases, even if it is...Corporations have formal decision procedures (policies, chains of command) that ...Member unawareness doesn't eliminate individual culpability; it merely obscures ...
    +3 moreShow less
    Moral agency requires consciousness or subjective experience; corporations lack ...Moral agency requires intentional action and responsibility attribution; corpora...We hold corporations legally and practically accountable as unified agents; deny...

    Details

    Type
    claim
    Perspectives
    2 (1 for, 1 against)
    Edits
    1 edit